12 Sept 07
Xxxx > I see you have kept the incorrect inforamtion re Trinity underachieving on the site, despite that fact that they've now blown all of the results from the past out of the water.
Alan > Couple of points about this:
Alan > (1) It’s my website & I decide what I put onto it, not you. Have you got that?
Alan > (2) I have already answered this point once, so why don’t you go back & read my previous response, because I am becoming really feed up of having to repeat myself to you.
Alan > (3) Please feel free to point to out where on my site I have placed incorrect information on, “Trinity Academy underachieving” Quote the offending sentences/paragraphs & explain precisely why you believe the information to be incorrect.
Xxxx > and you have ignored my last response
Alan > Why do you honestly believe that I have nothing else to do with my time other jump to attention every time one of your e-mails appears in my inbox; what are you, royalty or something?
Alan > All you have done so far is add weight to my claim that the ESF have exaggerated their claims to academic success. Despite the fact that I have pointed out to you that Trinity Academy has so far failed to even match the success of a nearby & unassuming, old, bog standard comprehensive, you so still insist on hyping up a performance that would better be described as average.
Xxxx > Xxxx
Alan> Alan